These ideal virtues or powers in man surpass or surround nature, comprehend natural laws and phenomena, penetrate the mysteries of the unknown and invisible and bring them forth into the realm of the known and visible. The books that challenge the conventional view, written by a neuroanatomist from Harvard and an experienced neurosurgeon and professor from Duke University, both report the continuing existence of human consciousness despite severe brain impairment—and do so from personal experience.
Here, from their websites, are two summaries of those severe impairments and the effects they had:. Jill Bolte Taylor was a year-old Harvard-trained and published brain scientist when a blood vessel exploded in her brain.
What is the evidence for/against the existence of God? | Reasonable Faith
Through the eyes of a curious neuroanatomist, she watched her mind completely deteriorate whereby she could not walk, talk, read, write, or recall any of her life. Near-Death Experiences, he would have been the first to explain, might feel real to the people having them, but in truth they are simply fantasies produced by brains under extreme stress. Then came the day when Dr. The part of the brain that controls thought and emotion—and in essence makes us human—shut down completely. For seven days Alexander lay in a hospital bed in a deep coma. He had come back. But the real miracle of his story lies elsewhere.
While his body lay in coma, Alexander journeyed beyond this world and encountered an angelic being who guided him into the deepest realms of super-physical existence.
First Statement - Dr. Craig
There he met the Divine source of the universe itself. After his own experience, Dr. Both of these scientists previously believed in the dominant paradigm—that human consciousness emanates only from physical structures. But after their own debilitating, life-threatening experiences with a severe stroke and near-fatal bacterial meningo-encephalitis, both learned a new way to view reality. With their brains severely impaired, they both realized, their consciousness did not diminish or disappear—instead, it expanded, grew and became more aware of the spiritual aspects of life.
The philosophers of the world are divided into two classes: materialists, who deny the spirit and its immortality, and the divine philosophers, the wise men of God, the true illuminati who believe in the spirit and its continuance hereafter. The ancient philosophers taught that man consists simply of the material elements which compose his cellular structure and that when this composition is disintegrated the life of man becomes extinct. They reasoned that man is body only, and from this elemental composition the organs and their functions, the senses, powers and attributes which characterize man have proceeded, and that these disappear completely with the physical body.
This is practically the statement of all the materialists. The divine philosophers proclaim that the spirit of man is ever-living and eternal, and because of the objections of the materialists, these wise men of God have advanced rational proofs to support the validity of their statement. Inasmuch as the materialistic philosophers deny the Books of God, scriptural demonstration is not evidence to them, and materialistic proofs are necessary.
Are we wired to believe in a higher power?
Answering them, the men of divine knowledge have said that all existing phenomena may be resolved into grades or kingdoms, classified progressively as mineral, vegetable, animal and human, each of which possesses its degree of function and intelligence. Our human consciousness, then, reflects a higher one—and proves that it exists. If this were so, existence itself would be sterile. There are many worlds of light. For even as the plant imagines life ends with itself and has no knowledge of our existence, so the materially-minded man has no knowledge of other worlds of consciousness. As human creatures fitted and qualified with this dual endowment, we must endeavor through the assistance and grace of God and by the exercise of our ideal power of intellect to attain all lofty virtues, that we may witness the effulgence of the Sun of Reality, reflect the spirit of the Kingdom, behold the manifest evidences of the reality of Divinity, comprehend irrefutable proofs of the immortality of the soul, live in conscious at-one-ment with the eternal world and become quickened and awake with the life and love of God.
- DEATH OF A FOLK HERO-UNSOLVED MURDER?;
- Get Started With HTML5;
- Good arguments needn’t be proofs!
Organic molecules are found in star forming regions, stellar remnants and interstellar gas, all throughout the Milky Way. Humphreys University of Minnesota. Believe it or not, these heavy elements — assembled into complex molecules — are unavoidable by this point in the Universe. Enough stars have lived and died that all the elements of the periodic table exist in fairly high abundances all throughout the galaxy. But are they assembled correctly? Taking a look towards the heart of our own galaxy is molecular cloud Sagittarius B, shown at the top of this page. Organic molecules found throughout the Universe, particularly towards the galactic center.
Image credit: Oliver Baum, University of Cologne. Like ethyl formate left and n-propyl cyanide right , the former of which is responsible for the smell of raspberries!
So with tens of billions of chances in our galaxy alone, and the building blocks already in place, you might think — as Fermi did — that the odds of intelligent life arising many times in our own galaxy is inevitable. But first, we need to make life from non-life. This is no small feat, and is one of the greatest puzzles around for natural scientists in all disciplines: the problem of abiogenesis.
At some point, this happened for us, whether it happened in space, in the oceans, or in the atmosphere, it happened, as evidenced by our very planet, and its distinctive diversity of life.
A young planet with the potential conditions for life could grow into an Earth-like world, or could remain devoid of life forever. But it could be far fewer than that as well. Was life on Earth likely? In other words, if we performed the chemistry experiment of forming our Solar System over and over again, would it take hundreds, thousands or even millions of chances to get life out once? So while, by many measures, there are plenty of intelligent animals, we are interested in a very particular type of intelligence.
Specifically, a type of intelligence that can communicate with us, despite the vast distances between the stars! So how common is that? From the first, self-replicating organic molecule to something as specialized and differentiated as a human being, we know we need billions of years of roughly constant temperatures, the right evolutionary steps, and a whole lot of luck. What are the odds that such a thing would have happened? Well, optimistically, maybe. Once intelligence, tool use and curiosity combine in a single species, perhaps interstellar ambitions become inevitable.
But it could be far fewer; we are not an inevitable consequence of evolution so much as a happy accident of it. Even one-in-a-million seems like it might be too optimistic for the odds of human-like animals evolving on an Earth-like world with the right ingredients for life; I could easily imagine that it would take a billion Earths or more to get something like human beings out just once. If we take the optimistic estimate of the optimistic estimate above, perhaps million worlds are out there capable of communicating with us, in our galaxy alone.
In other words, life is a fantastic bet, but intelligent life may not be. So the conditions for life are definitely everywhere, but life itself could be common or rare, and what we consider intelligent life could be common, rare or practically non-existent in our galaxy. Reaching, broadcasting and listening for the evidence of others has so far returned an empty, lonely result.
Image credit: Victor Bobbett. Certainly, there are people that will argue that it does. Consider this:. Do you want or need your belief in a divine or supernatural origin to the Universe to be based in something that could be scientifically disproven? I am very open about not being a man of faith myself, but of having tremendous respect for those who are believers. Will your faith be shaken if we find that, hey, guess what, chemistry works to form life on other worlds the same way it worked in the past on this one?
Or, can your beliefs — whatever they are — stand up to whatever scientific truths the Universe reveals about itself, regardless of what they are? There may or may not be other worlds very, very similar to our own out there, but neither result is necessarily an indicator of a divine presence. The truths of the Universe are written out there, on the Universe itself, and are accessible to us all through the process of inquiry. To allow an uncertain faith to stand in as an answer where scientific knowledge is required does us all a disservice; the illusion of knowledge — or reaching a conclusion before obtaining the evidence — is a poor substitute for what we might actually come to learn, if only we ask the right questions.
The joys of knowing — of figuring out the answers to questions for ourselves — is one that none of us should be cheated out of.
Related I Have Proof of a Higher Power
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved